Toolkit
The Dairy & Chilled Toolkit
Thirteen records for processors of milk, cheese, yoghurt, cream, gelato and chilled desserts. The ones a dairy regulator, a certification auditor or a major retailer will ask to see — written by someone who works in dairy quality assurance, not adapted from a generic food template.
- Thirteen records, each on its own sheet
- Pasteuriser, CIP, cold chain and environmental monitoring
- Traceability built for silo blending, not generic batching
- Document control and a worked example on every sheet
- Editable Excel — yours to adapt, no licence conditions
One payment. No subscription.
Request the toolkit
I'll send a tax invoice. The file follows as soon as it's paid.
The thirteen records
Grouped the way a dairy plant actually runs.
Why these thirteen
Dairy gets asked harder questions than most sectors, and they are usually validation questions.
A receival log with no rejections isn't a control
If nothing has ever been rejected in two years, the limit isn't being applied. The sheet records rejections as prominently as acceptances, because that's the evidence the control is real.
Silo blending breaks generic traceability
A batch can carry more than one intake, and a problem with one intake reaches every batch drawn from that silo until it's emptied and cleaned. The lot record is built for that, not for simple one-in-one-out batching.
A signature isn't a chart
"Chart reviewed" with a signature is not the same as keeping the chart. The pasteuriser record prompts for both, and for the temperature at which flow diversion actually occurred.
A clean EMP result sheet is a warning sign
Positives in zones 2 to 4 are expected in a working plant. A programme that never finds anything is usually swabbing the easy sites rather than the drains, floor-wall junctions and condensate points where the organism lives.
A wrong date code is a recall
Not a non-conformance. The verification sheet compares the printed code against the date calculated from your validated shelf life — not against what was printed yesterday.
Every limit here is an example
Dairy processing is licensed, and your critical limits have to come from your own validation and licence conditions. Nothing in this workbook is a limit to copy, and it says so on every sheet that carries a number.
What this toolkit is not
These are records, not a food safety programme and not a HACCP plan. Dairy processing is licensed — in Queensland through Safe Food Production Queensland — and your accredited programme, critical limits and validations have to be specific to your own plant, product and process.
Allergen matrix, supplier approval, internal audit, CAPA, validation and verification registers, mock recall, training and document control are general QA records rather than dairy-specific ones. Those are in the QA Manager Toolkit, so the two complement each other instead of duplicating.
If you need the program itself built around what you actually do, that's the consulting side of what I do.
Questions
What format is it?
A single Excel workbook, thirteen sheets plus a cover. It opens in Excel, Numbers or Google Sheets. Everything is editable — change the columns, the frequencies, the wording, whatever suits your operation.
Can I use it across more than one site?
Yes. One purchase covers your business, however many sites you run. What it doesn't cover is reselling it or passing it to another business.
Will it make me compliant?
No, and be careful of anyone who says a template will. Dairy processing is licensed and your accredited programme has to match your own plant. These records are how you demonstrate you followed it — they are not the programme itself.
How do I pay?
Fill in the form and I'll email a tax invoice with bank details. The toolkit comes back as soon as payment clears — usually the same day.
Do I need the QA Manager Toolkit as well?
They're built to sit together. This one covers what's specific to dairy; the QA Manager Toolkit covers the general system around it — audit, CAPA, validation, supplier approval, allergen matrix, training and document control. Most processors want both. Ask and I'll do the pair for $249.
What if it isn't what I expected?
Tell me within fourteen days and I'll refund it. I'd rather that than have you feel stung by a $149 spreadsheet.